Following RY-567, we've created a bug when customers used limit=-1 in the RY Report
In RY-567, we've fixed the limit for the traceability matrix. We've fixed every use of "-1" in the code to replace it with direct method calls, but we've missed that customers could use -1 in the RY Report macro.
Fixed by considering -1 and replacing it with the highest limit possible (the Global Limit, 12000 by default).
The following happens since our update to RY 2.4.10:
include a RY report in a confluence page and set limit to "-1". (The tooltip says, that -1 is to be used if all requirements shall be shown)
then save the page
Confluence renders the report but shows no requrements at all
Confluence renders the report and shows all requiremets found by the query behind the report
Although it seems to be a small bug, it has HUGE impact on our project, because all our RY reports currently show no requirements and we use them a lot. Manually changing all reports to not have "-1" would mean a lot of effort for us.